What do we make of Abigail’s loyalty and her husband Nabal’s disloyalty to David in 1 Samuel 25? They are two unseemly characters in God’s narrative of the coming Messiah. Abigail seems an insignificant character at first, but there’s a lot more depth to her example.
At the end of this particular narrative, Abigail becomes David’s wife (and we also see David’s sin of acquiring multiple wives). Is this story told simply to disclose how Abigail became David’s wife? Or is it being told for some other reason? My conclusion is it’s being told to convey a larger message of God’s providence over His faithful.
A photo of En Gedi I took on my pilgrimage to Israel, where David first spared Saul’s life.
To understand the whole of the context, let’s start at the beginning of the narrative. Observe the map above. David had just spared Saul’s life for the first time at an oasis in En Gedi (personal photo of the En Gedi oasis on the right).
Afterwards, he travels westward to Maon to deal with a man, Nabal, whose business is in Carmel. The question is, why would David come out of hiding to deal with this man? There are two reasons.
The first is a conjecture. Prior to this, David spares Saul’s life at En Gedi and makes his case before him. Saul realizes David is in the right, saying, “You are more righteous than I, for you have repaid me good, whereas I have repaid you evil. And you have declared this day how you have dealt well with me, in that you did not kill me when the LORD put me into your hands. For if a man finds his enemy, will he let him go away safe? So may the LORD reward you with good for what you have done to me this day. And now, behold, I know that you shall surely be king, and that the kingdom of Israel shall be established in your hand” (1 Samuel 24:17-20). Then Saul leaves peaceably. So, David had every reason to believe his life was no longer in danger (which he finds to be false in chapter 26).
The second reason is what David himself says. Nabal was a rich man who had 3,000 sheep and 1,000 goats. He sent his messengers to Nabal to speak on his behalf, saying, “Peace be to you, and peace be to your house, and peace be to all that you have. I hear that you have shearers. Now, your shepherds have been with us, and we did them no harm, and they missed nothing all the time they were in Carmel. Ask your young men, and they will tell you. Therefore, let my young men find favor in your eyes, for we come on a feast day. Please give whatever you have at hand to your servants and to your son David” (25:6-8). David’s purpose for doing business with Nabal is simple: It’s sheep-shearing season. So he sends his men to parley with Nabal that they may be given wool in payment of the protection David gave him.
Nabal, however, pretends he doesn’t know who David is and refuses to offer wool as payment for David’s protection. In response, David prepared 400 of his men to take the life of Nabal and every male in his house. This may seem like an overreaction—and it is—but keep in mind David was acting according to the customs of his day. When payment was refused a king, it was common cultural practice for the king to kill the man and wipe out his lineage.
This does not excuse David’s reaction, but it does explain rationally why David acted the way he did. David expresses his anger, “Sure in vain have I guarded all that this fellow has in the wilderness, so that nothing was missed of all that belonged to him, and he has returned me evil for good” (v. 21). In other words, “I have protected this man’s life and very livelihood for nothing. And he insults me and refuses payment!” I would be angry too. Wouldn’t you?
Enter Abigail, a humble woman. It’s worth noting how God often used women in biblical times as examples of His mercy, wisdom, and providence in cultures that treated women like objects. In response to Nabal’s foolishness, Abigail prepares “two hundred loaves and two skins of wine and five sheep… and five seahs [about 7 quarts/7.3 liters for one seah] of parched grain and a hundred clusters of raisins and two hundred cakes of figs” for David (v. 18). Abigail prepares for David goods above and beyond what he asked for.
Afterwards, Abigail has a long dialogue with David (vv. 24-35). In her exchange with him, she confesses her complete loyalty, referring to David as her lord. She reveals to David that because Nabal’s name means “fool,” he should not deal with a fool. She says, “Let not my lord regard this worthless fellow, Nabal, for as his name is, so is he. Nabal is his name, and folly is with him” (v. 25). She basically says, “His name means worthless, which means he is worthless. Because he is worthless, he is not worth your time or trouble.”
In her words, Abigail reveals David’s error and confesses whom David is to become. She says, “Now then, my lord, as the LORD lives, and as your soul lives, because the LORD has restrained you from bloodguilt and from saving with your own hand, now then let your enemies and those who seek to do evil to my lord be as Nabal” (v. 26). She tells David that his error was trying to take salvation into his own hands instead of leaving it to God.
Because of Abigail’s intervention, she prevented him from being guilty of having innocent blood on his hands. David acknowledges all this when he says to her, “Blessed be your discretion, and blessed be you, who have kept me this day from bloodguilt and from working salvation with my own hand! For as surely as the LORD, the God of Israel, lives, who has restrained me from hurting you, unless you had hurried and come to meet me, truly by morning there had not been left to Nabal so much as one male” (vv. 33-34).
Secondly, unlike Nabal, Abigail knows who David is. She says, “Please forgive the trespass of your servant. For the LORD will certainly make my lord a sure house, because my lord is fighting the battles of the LORD, and evil shall not be found in you so long as you live” (v. 28).
This is a foreshadowing of God’s promise to David through the prophet Nathan, “Moreover, the LORD declares to you that the LORD will make you a house. When your days are fulfilled and you lie down with your fathers, I will raise up your offspring after you, who shall come from your body, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a house for My name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever” (2 Samuel 7:11-13).
When David made an inquiry to God to build Him a temple (a house), God’s answer was no. But God made the promise that David’s son—who would be Solomon—would build Him a house. He makes a further promise the house of David would continue forever.
This leads me to my two main points. But before I get there, I want to address some wordplay in the next chapter, which covers David sparing Saul’s life a second time. After David spares Saul’s life a second time, Saul confesses, “I have sinned. Return, my son David, for I will no more do you harm, because my life was precious in your eyes this day. Behold, I have acted foolishly, and have made a great mistake” (1 Samuel 26:21, emphasis added).
Hebrew often uses puns and other wordplay in the Old Testament historical narratives to imply deeper meaning, which we will see more of later. The first time David spared Saul’s life, Saul does not say he acted foolishly. If you recall, Saul only admits David was more righteous than he. This second time, after dealing with the foolish man Nabal whose name means “foolish,” David spares Saul’s life after Abigail’s intervention to spare her husband’s life, and Saul ironically admits his foolish behavior.
This language is no accident; this is merely one of many other times the same word is used directly after another side narrative. For example, the Hebrew historical narrative does the same thing in Genesis 37 and 38 with the word for “recognize,” connecting the irony between Joseph’s brothers in chapter 37 telling their father Jacob to recognize Joseph’s bloody cloak and Tamar in chapter 38 telling Judah to recognize the seal, cord, and staff he gave her when she was pretending to be a prostitute.
The Hebrew authors used “recognize” to show the irony between Judah’s actions and the word “foolish” to show the irony between David’s actions. Furthermore, it’s likely God used Abigail to spare the foolish Nabal’s life to encourage David to continue sparing Saul’s life since, after all, David cannot lift his hand upon the Lord’s anointed, as he confesses several times.
Anyway, moving on to my two main points. The first is the typology of Abigail’s confession to David. A “type” is a theological term describing persons, things, and events in the Old Testament that foreshadow Christ or a thing related to Christ. For example, Moses is a type of Christ in that his office of prophet foreshadowed the office of prophet Jesus would hold. (Note especially Moses’ words, “The LORD your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your brothers—it is to him you shall listen”—Deuteronomy 18:15.)
Another example is the Great Flood as a type of Christ foreshadowing Christ’s institution of Baptism. On this, Peter says, “Baptism, which corresponds to this [the Flood], now saves you” (1 Peter 3:21). In other words, as the Flood destroyed and condemned, now baptism saves you (see Romans 6for further understanding).
Abigail’s faith in David—more so her faith in God through David—is the type of confession Gentiles are to make in Christ. Paul comments on this, saying, “For I tell you that Christ became a servant to the circumcised to show God’s faithfulness, in order to confirm the promises given to the patriarchs, and in order that the Gentiles might glorify God for His mercy… And again Isaiah says, ‘The root of Jesse will come, even he who arises to rule the Gentiles; in Him will the Gentiles hope” (Romans 15:8-9, 12).
Paul was quoting from Isaiah 11:1, 10. Abigail’s faith in David exemplifies the faith we have in Christ, the root of Jesse. (Jesus is called the root of Jesse—David’s father—because Christ is in the bloodline of David, the tribe of Judah.) God promised David his house would continue forever, and so it does through Christ. Abigail confessed this faith, and so today we confess the same faith. The house of Christ the son of David shall endure forever, and we as living stones make up the house of God (1 Peter 2:5).
My second point is God’s providence over His faithful. David sought Nabal’s death as recompense for disloyalty to his king. Abigail prevented David from doing this act that belongs to God alone. Just ten days after David and Abigail’s exchange, God strikes Nabal dead, and David praises Him (25:38-39). As I read this account, I found myself reading it over and over again because I couldn’t understand why it was necessary to take Nabal’s life. After all, his only crime was refusing payment for David’s protection. Certainly that’s not grounds for death? False—it is.
Let me explain. While Abigail was pleading for her husband’s life, Nabal was feasting like a king and getting drunk (v. 36). He had no concern he had offended the future king David. Verse 37 gives a colorful way of describing Nabal’s recovery from the prior night’s festivities, “when the wine had gone out of Nabal.”
As we saw earlier, Hebrew uses wordplay every now and then to imply deeper meaning. In Hebrew, Nabal is only three letters (נבל), which the word for “wineskin” or “storage jar” has the same three consonantal root letters. The difference between the two are the vowels given for each—נָבָל (Nabal, meaning foolish), and נֵבֶל (nēbel) for “wineskin” or “jar.” In short, the Hebrew writer made a pun, in which Nabal is being compared to a wineskin. In other words, he is being compared to his bladder.
There is more wordplay with Nabal’s name. Solomon writes a proverb later, “Under three things the earth trembles; under four it cannot bear up: a slave when he becomes king, and a fool when he is filled with food” (Proverbs 30:21-22). As David’s son, perhaps Solomon was told this story growing up, thus using Nabal’s name as a pun once more. Not exactly a reputation you want to leave behind for yourself.
The way Nabal’s death is described is also interesting: “his heart died within him, and he became as a stone” (v. 38). It’s speculated he had a heart attack and died 10 days later from it. We cannot know for sure, but it should be obvious Nabal’s heart was also hardened against God. Just as Pharaoh hardened his heart against God and suffered the consequences, so Nabal’s hardening of his heart reaped the consequence of his death.
In the face of this, we need to remember we all deserve death, “For the wages of sin is death” (Romans 6:23). Every lie, lust, and sin is punishable by death. The worst sin of all is unbelief—the hardening of the heart.
We must also remember Job’s confession, “Naked I came from my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return. The LORD gave, and the LORD has taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD” (Job 1:21). In other words, God as Creator has the authority to give and take away. He has given us life, and He can take it away just as easily. Thus Job praises Him, which He deserves.
Yet the Romans verse continues, “but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” God is faithful to His promises whether that promise is eternal life or condemnation in unbelief. When God takes Nabal’s life, David praises God not for killing Nabal, but for saving him from committing an evil deed. He says, “Blessed be the LORD who has avenged the insult I received at the hand of Nabal, and has kept back His servant from wrongdoing” (v. 39). God avenged David, but He also saved David from committing an evil deed through the wise counsel of Abigail. This is what I mean by God’s providence.
It appears to me there are many antinomian Christians in America. Antinomian means “against law,” which are Christians who think the law no longer applies to Christians because we have the Gospel. Yes, we have the Gospel—the forgiveness of sins in Christ—but the law still applies to us.
I could write a whole other article on this, but to keep it short, there are three uses of the law: The curb, mirror, and guide. The curb of the law restrains us from sinning (think of a speed limit sign); the mirror of the law reveals to us who we are as sinners and our need for forgiveness; and the guide of the law shows Christians how to live holy lives before God.
There needs to be a proper distinction between Law and Gospel: As a sinner and rebel against God, you deserve death (law, Romans 3:23; 6:23a). God has done what was necessary to redeem us from death through the sacrifice of Christ on the cross for all who believe (Romans 3:24-26; 6:23b), not by our own doing (Gospel, Ephesians 2:8-9). All that being said, many Christians today focus so much on the Gospel they forget we are miserable sinners. While they recognize God is compassionate, loving, and merciful, they also forget He is King and Judge, and as such, He exacts His vengeance against the wicked.
Paul wrote, “Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is Mine, I will repay, says the Lord’” (Romans 12:19). Paul was quoting from Deuteronomy 32:35. The law is that God will avenge us (we get a bloody depiction of His wrath in Revelation), and the reality is this is the wrath we deserve as sinners.
The Gospel is “God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do. By sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh, in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit” (Romans 8:3-4).
Part of this gospel is that He provides for us through physical means. Why do you think we pray for our daily bread in the Lord’s Prayer? Because it sounds nice? He provides for us through farmers, jobs, the people in our lives (like Abigail for David), and other various means (see Matthew 6:25-34for further reading).
So, what have we learned from Abigail’s example? It points us to Christ. The faith she confessed in who David is is the same faith all Gentiles were to make in who Christ is. As Abigail confessed her faith in David’s kingship and lordship, so we confess the same faith in the Kingship and Lordship of Christ our Savior. She had faith that David would be a sure house, whose house endures forever through our Lord Jesus Christ. As our King, Jesus provides for us through ordinary means for our daily needs, and also provides protection from the wicked and our own wickedness as King.
Garrick Sinclair "Ricky" Beckett first started his Christian writing on a blog titled "The Lutheran Column" where he hires proficient Lutheran writers to convey biblical truth. Along with the blog, he also writes poetry, string quartets in music composition, enjoys doing photography, reading, and playing video games. Ricky is a graduate from Concordia University-Ann Arbor from the Pre-Seminary program with a major in Christian Thought and a minor in Theological Languages. Currently, Ricky is a seminarian at Concordia Seminary in St. Louis as he works on his Masters of Divinity to become a pastor in the LCMS (Lutheran Church Missouri Synod).
GDPR & CCPA:
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.